afan1
[link]http://www.wiaawi.org/index.php?id=411[/link]
"The name All-Northwest itself means something to readers of the Leader-Telegram." ?

DO JUSTICE, LOVE MERCY, WALK HUMBLY
Quote 0 0
bluechip
This is one of those ideas that looks better to me in the abstract than it does in practice. I really like the idea of eliminating the system where playoff births are, to a large extent, decided by whether schools are playing in conferences with similarly-sized schools. But, I think there are several negatives as well:

1) Rivalries
Only having 1 non-district game will necessitate ending traditional rivalries (for example, I think New Richmond and Baldwin-Woodville have a traditional rivalry, but if they play each other, then New Richmond and Somerset can't play, which should be a rivalry). This is really the least of my concerns though.

2) Travel
Looking at Amery's and Osceola's proposed district for an example, I am seeing 3 opponents that are 2-1/2 to 3 hours away, 1 more 1-1/2 hours away, 1 more 1 hour away, and 2 opponents less than an hour commute. That doesn't include Week 9 matchups, which will be a minimum of 2 hours away. That means that if the travel schedule is divided evenly year-to-year, it will involve 1 trip each season under an hour, 1 trip in the 1 to 1-1/2 hour range, and 2 trips over 2 hours. That seems like a lot of travel when there are a slew of perfectly suitable opponents located within an hour.

Not only is that a lot of travel for the kids, but I'm guessing that community involvement takes a hit as well. People without kids playing just aren't going to make those kinds of drives for regular season games in most communities, so it essentially limits community involvement with the program to 3-4 games per season.

3) Ninth Game.
I like the ninth game for teams that don't make the playoffs, but I think it would be better if it was not a pre-determined matchup between districts. I think schools and kids would be better served if they could schedule their own game against a nearby school, so they don't have to travel 2-3 hours for a game with nothing on the line. As a game without any playoff or conference implications, it is essentially just a game for fun, to see what some younger kids can do, and to give the seniors one last night. Especially with it being the definite last game for seniors, I assume a lot of family will like to see these games, so why not let the schools schedule games to closer opponents rather than forcing them to travel halfway across the state. If we are going to force these teams to travel so far, then we might as well put them all in the playoffs as far as I am concerned.


This may be a proposal that is better for the state as a whole, but has more negative impacts in certain parts of the state. It's a good idea, but I think it could still use some fine-tuning before being implemented.
Quote 0 0
FHS5479_old
Bluechip wrote:


This is one of those ideas that looks better to me in the abstract than it does in practice. I really like the idea of eliminating the system where playoff births are, to a large extent, decided by whether schools are playing in conferences with similarly-sized schools. But, I think there are several negatives as well:

1) Rivalries
Only having 1 non-district game will necessitate ending traditional rivalries (for example, I think New Richmond and Baldwin-Woodville have a traditional rivalry, but if they play each other, then New Richmond and Somerset can't play, which should be a rivalry). This is really the least of my concerns though.

2) Travel
Looking at Amery's and Osceola's proposed district for an example, I am seeing 3 opponents that are 2-1/2 to 3 hours away, 1 more 1-1/2 hours away, 1 more 1 hour away, and 2 opponents less than an hour commute. That doesn't include Week 9 matchups, which will be a minimum of 2 hours away. That means that if the travel schedule is divided evenly year-to-year, it will involve 1 trip each season under an hour, 1 trip in the 1 to 1-1/2 hour range, and 2 trips over 2 hours. That seems like a lot of travel when there are a slew of perfectly suitable opponents located within an hour.

Not only is that a lot of travel for the kids, but I'm guessing that community involvement takes a hit as well. People without kids playing just aren't going to make those kinds of drives for regular season games in most communities, so it essentially limits community involvement with the program to 3-4 games per season.

3) Ninth Game.
I like the ninth game for teams that don't make the playoffs, but I think it would be better if it was not a pre-determined matchup between districts. I think schools and kids would be better served if they could schedule their own game against a nearby school, so they don't have to travel 2-3 hours for a game with nothing on the line. As a game without any playoff or conference implications, it is essentially just a game for fun, to see what some younger kids can do, and to give the seniors one last night. Especially with it being the definite last game for seniors, I assume a lot of family will like to see these games, so why not let the schools schedule games to closer opponents rather than forcing them to travel halfway across the state. If we are going to force these teams to travel so far, then we might as well put them all in the playoffs as far as I am concerned.


This may be a proposal that is better for the state as a whole, but has more negative impacts in certain parts of the state. It's a good idea, but I think it could still use some fine-tuning before being implemented.


It would be a better idea for non-playoff schools to be able to schedule games against closer opponents. By then they want to season to be over so having closer opponents would be easier on the traveling teams. However, a situation could arise where the closest opponents have all qualifed for the playoffs which ends up making the team still travel a long ways. This idea isn't perfect, but its a great start. Should be very interesting once its put into operation.
Always remember the 25th of December(for more then 1 reason)

Winona St. Softball! 34-11
Winona St. Baseball! 32-14
Quote 0 0
bluechip
FHS5479 wrote:
It would be a better idea for non-playoff schools to be able to schedule games against closer opponents. By then they want to season to be over so having closer opponents would be easier on the traveling teams. However, a situation could arise where the closest opponents have all qualifed for the playoffs which ends up making the team still travel a long ways. This idea isn't perfect, but its a great start. Should be very interesting once its put into operation.


Theoretically that is possible, but with half the teams in the state not making the playoffs I think there will be plenty of teams nearby to schedule that last game against. Teams wouldn't have to stay within their own division for that, if they got to schedule the game themselves.

But I agree that it is a step in the right direction overall.
Quote 0 0
wissportsnet

Boys Basketball Alumni Round-up: February 21st, from @ColtonWilson23 #wisbb -- https://t.co/0K6CZzZWpf https://t.co/715tfpBGVS

wissportsnet

WSN15: Boys Basketball Top Teams #12 -- Two NCAA Division I players at one WIAA Division 4 school = state champions… https://t.co/1MThqzce9L

wissportsnet

Predicting winners of every state wrestling title plus a look By The Numbers, from @Nate_Woelfel -… https://t.co/HgU1bLP7d6

wissportsnet

Join the free Boys Basketball Playoff Pick 'Em Contest; Staff picks coming Tuesday #wisbb -- https://t.co/Y6yTA3OgP8 https://t.co/hA6Uyw9uje